| By Mike Gruss NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced last week a new directive aimed at what he described as a loss of technical competency in the agency and as a way to rely less on contractors. "NASA has outright lost or outsourced many core competencies in engineering and operations that once enabled the agency to undertake the near-impossible in air and space," he said in a video posted to social media. Questions about NASA's workforce have been a constant during the second Trump administration. In the last year, at least 5,000 space workers left the U.S. government. That's through reductions in force, resignations and retirements. It marks one of the most significant changes in the space workforce in the last 50 years. For the last several months, SpaceNews' Debra Werner has been interviewing some of those employees. Last week, we published eight of the conversations as Q&As. A few of my favorite anecdotes: From Mark Munsell, who was at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency: "There was a Reduction in Force in 1997. I was working for a boss on a project on a Friday. I came back on Monday with the same boss on the same project making twice as much money because they outsourced me. While that was good for my family, it was bad for the agency and bad for the country. The government can be too short sighted with this zeal to outsource because you need people with those skills as leaders in the government." From Shawn Phillips, who was at the Air Force Research Lab: "On a Thursday night, I sent out a message on LinkedIn saying that I decided to go into consulting. Over the next few hours I counted 28 calls from people that wanted me to consult." And this from Charity Weeden, who had been at NASA: "Every day I walked by the worm [logo] in front of headquarters and said to myself, 'Kick ass today, Charity, because you don't know when this dream will end.' It's worth making time to read the whole package.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment