What defense buyers want from space startups
As investment continues to flow into defense and space startups, the U.S. Space Force is trying to attract more commercial companies into the national security market. Yet after hearing hundreds of pitches from founders over the past year, one official says many startups are still missing a fundamental point: technology alone is not enough.
Speaking last week at the State of the Space Industrial Base conference in New Mexico, Col. Tim Trimailo, head of the Space Systems Command Commercial Space Office, offered observations from his interactions with commercial firms. His advice was straightforward:
“Start with the ‘why,” Trimailo said. Founders often know their technology in extraordinary detail, he noted, but frequently fail to explain what military capability it enables or why a warfighter should care.
The comments highlight a shifting landscape in the defense space sector. Venture investors have poured money into companies developing satellites, communications networks, sensors, software and other technologies on the assumption that Pentagon demand for commercial capabilities will continue to grow. Converting technical innovation into sustained government business, however, remains difficult.
For Trimailo, the issue is often less about the quality of the technology than how companies frame it. “We buy capability, we don't buy widgets,” he said.
Transparency is another recurring theme. In a relatively small industry, Trimailo argued, attempts to conceal technical problems can undermine credibility more than the problems themselves. A satellite that underperforms or a mission that encounters setbacks is not necessarily disqualifying. What matters is whether a company can explain what happened and how it plans to address it.
The same principle applies when discussing proprietary technology. Companies do not need to reveal trade secrets, but they must provide enough detail for government evaluators to understand how a system works and assess whether performance claims are realistic.
Don't become a defense company
One of Trimailo's strongest warnings was directed at startups that reshape their products too aggressively around government requirements. He cautioned against abandoning commercial markets. If a product already satisfies most of the government's needs, redesigning it to capture the remaining fraction of a requirement may not be worth the tradeoff.
That thinking increasingly shapes how the Space Force views commercial integration. Officials see greater value in companies that maintain healthy commercial markets and outside investors.
Trimailo pointed to firms that move strategically between government and private funding. A company might use an initial Small Business Innovation Research award to demonstrate government interest, raise venture capital based on that validation, and then use the private investment to compete for larger programs such as Tactical Funding Increase (TACFI) or Strategic Funding Increase (STRATFI) awards.
“We want to see dual-use capabilities, we want to see other people paying down some of our R&D bills,” he said.
|
