The U.S. military's evolving thinking on refueling satellites
Recent comments by Gen. Stephen Whiting, head of U.S. Space Command, shed light on the military's evolving thinking regarding satellite in-orbit refueling.
"Today when we operate in space it's really positional warfare," Whiting said last week at the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.
"And typically, that's because we only have the fuel we've launched with and so we never want to move or if we do, we always ask the question of how much life is this going to take off the back end of the satellite."
This constraint has traditionally limited the military's ability to maneuver assets in space freely. However, the advent of in-orbit refueling technologies could alter this paradigm, especially for high-value assets in geostationary orbit.
Whiting emphasized the Space Force's desire to achieve greater maneuverability in space, stating, "We want to get to a place where we can maneuver in the domain just like we do in every other domain."
But not all space assets would be candidates for refueling. "Certainly we would not want to try to refuel a proliferated LEO constellation," he said, referring to the lower-cost satellites in low Earth orbit. But the capability could be crucial for defending high-value satellites in geosynchronous orbit that could potentially be tailed by adversaries.
As Whiting pointed out, the U.S. does not want to be in a position where it can't defend a satellite because it's trying to conserve fuel.
No comments:
Post a Comment